
The CEOs of Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines defended their proposed $3.1 billion merger before House and Senate committees Thursday, addressing lawmakers' concerns that the deal would stifle competition in the airline industry or result in massive job losses.Read More...
"Oil is a game changer, and this merger makes us stronger," Anderson told the House Judiciary Committee, noting that fuel prices have doubled in the last 12 months. "[The merger] gives us the ability to compete and win against foreign flag carriers."
Steenland said the merged airline would be more "financially stable and resilient," better able to meet customer needs and better able to provide benefits to workers. He also said no hubs would be closed as a result.
"We've gone from a highly competitive structure to an oligopoly," said Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the House panel, noting that passengers have suffered increased delays and prices from prior industry consolidation.
"We need to consider where this merger will take us," he said. "I'm concerned that if this merger is approved it will simply result in a cascade of other mergers."
During the debate, Delta and Northwest proposed the same argument used by almost any merging companies: It will be more stable. This argument is somewhat flismy and the threat of an oligopoly and slippery slope effect is greater. Regardless, most mergers do get approved, and with the ATT merger aproval, it seems almost any company can merge without serious opposition.
Grade This Post.





